• Font Size    
E-mail

Close Window E-mail This Page

Pathologists Disagree On Ellerbe's Wounds

Required fields are marked with an asterisk(*)



The information you provide will be used only to send the requested e-mail and will not be used to send any other e-mail communications. Read more in our Privacy Policy

Send E-mail

   Print     Share +   

Pathologists Disagree On Ellerbe's Wounds

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ― Testimony continued today in the lawsuit filed against two state troopers accused in the shooting death of a 12-year-old boy.

Michael Ellerbe was shot as a suspect in 2002 duringĀ a stolen car pursuit on Christmas Eve in Uniontown. Samuel Nassan and Juan Curry, the troopers involved in the shooting, were cleared of criminal wrong-doing.

Former Allegheny County Cyril Wecht testified Ellerbe was shot once, but former Wayne County Michigan Medical Examiner Werner Spitz says the boy was shot twice.

"In regards to the shots, there's no hocus pocus in the number of shots because as I said the location of the wounds and the orientation of the wounds and the appearance of each shot," Spitz said.

Wecht's firm was hired by the Fayette County Coroner to do the autopsy. He says the arm wound was just an exit wound abrasion.

"If you look at my autopsy report, and this has been in place long before attorneys got into the picture, it's described as a superficial wound. In fact, the word abrasion was used and an abrasion is a scratch. So there was no perforation, there was no depth to it at all," Wecht said. "I respectfully and very strongly must disagree."

Testimony resumes in the Ellerbe case tomorrow.

(© MMIX, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

You need the latest Flash player to view video content.
Click here to download.

Click here to bypass this detection if you already have the latest Flash Player.